Caring for the Earth as a Matter of Faith

A Christian Perspective on the Ecological Crisis

  • Edi Purwanto Universitas Pembangunan Jaya, Tangerang Selatan, Indonesia
Keywords: ecotheology, theological ecology, Christian ecology, enviromental management, ecological crisis

Abstract

Global environmental crises demand new approaches to conservation, including religious perspectives such as Christianity. The Christian perspective provides a significant theological and ethical framework for environmental management. This study aims to explore and analyze the contribution of the Christian perspective to environmental management through a systematic literature review approach. This study employs a systematic literature review approach to explore ecological concepts within Christianity. Data were collected from major academic databases such as Scopus and Google Scholar, focusing on eco-theology and environmental management from a Christian viewpoint. Findings indicate that Christian doctrines of creation and stewardship support environmental responsibility. Interfaith dialogue, integrating Christian spirituality with ecological issues, and a comprehensive eco-theological understanding are crucial for addressing environmental crises. This research encourages the Christian community to actively engage in environmental conservation efforts and develop management strategies grounded in spiritual values. Dialogue and collaboration among religious communities can enhance global sustainability efforts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agbiji, Obaji M. “Religion and Ecological Justice in Africa: Engaging ‘Value for Community’ as Praxis for Ecological and Socio-Economic Justice.” HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies 71, no. 2 (2015): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v71i2.2663.

Breon, John Andrew. “Christian Doctrine as a Means of Christian Spiritual Formation.” Asbury Theological Seminary, 2008. https://place.asburyseminary.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1303&context=ecommonsatsdissertations.

Bürgi, Matthias, and Urs Gimmi. “Three Objectives of Historical Ecology: The Case of Litter Collecting in Central European Forests.” Landscape Ecology 22, no. SUPPL. 1 (2007): 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9128-0.

Craig, William Lane. “Creation and Conservation Once More.” Religious Studies 34, no. 2 (1998): 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412598004326.

Damonte, Marco. “God, the Bible and the Environment: An Historical Excursus on the Relationship between Christian Religion and Ecology.” Relations 5, no. 1 (2017): 27–45. https://doi.org/10.7358/rela-2017-001-damo.

Danz, Christian. “Theology of Nature: Reflections on the Dogmatic Doctrine of Creation.” HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies 77, no. 3 (2021): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v77i3.6720.

Denyer, David, and David Tranfield. “Producing a Systematic Review.” The Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd, 2009.

Dreyer, Wim A., and Jerry Pillay. “Historical Theology: Content, Methodology and Relevance.” Verbum et Ecclesia 38, no. 4 (2017): 117–31. https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v38i4.1680.

George, Marie. “Is Eco-Theologian Thomas Berry a Thomist?” Scientia et Fides 7, no. 1 (2019): 47–71. https://doi.org/10.12775/SETF.2019.003.

Kim-Cragg, Hyeran. “Preaching Addressing Environmental Crises through the Use of Scripture: An Exploration of a Practical Theological Methodology.” Religions 13, no. 3 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13030226.

Körtner, Ulrich. “Ecological Ethics and Creation Faith.” HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies 72, no. 4 (2016): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v72i4.3296.

Körtner, Ulrich H.J. “The Human Being and the World as God’s Creation: Present-Day Ethical Conflicts and Consequences of the Doctrine of Creation in the Perspective of the Doctrine of Justification.” HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies 77, no. 3 (2021): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v77i3.6491.

Kroesbergen, Hermen. “Ecology: Its Relative Importance and Absolute Irrelevance for a Christian: A Kierkegaardian Transversal Space for the Controversy on Eco-Theology.” HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies 70, no. 1 (2014): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v70i1.2719.

Lowe, Benjamin S., Susan K. Jacobson, Glenn D. Israel, and Anna L. Peterson. “Association of Religious End Time Beliefs with Attitudes toward Climate Change and Biodiversity Loss.” Sustainability (Switzerland) 15, no. 11 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15119071.

Macklin, R. “Applying the Four Principles.” Journal of Medical Ethics 29, no. 5 (2003): 275–80. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.29.5.275.

Mitchell, Donald W. “Catholic Theology of Creation: Nature’s Value and Relation to Humankind.” Claritas: Journal of Dialogue and Culture 4, no. 2 (2015): 70–74.

Morariu, Iuliu-Marius. “Ecology – Main Concern for the Christian Space of the 21st Century? Catholic and Orthodox Perspectives.” Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 19, no. 56 (2020): 124–35.

Osgood, Libby. “Ecological Saints: Adopting a Green Gaze of the Life and Writings of Saint Marguerite Bourgeoys.” Zygon 58, no. 3 (2023): 569–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12889.

Pangihutan, Posman, and Demsy Jura. “Ecotheology and Analysis of Christian Education in Overcoming Ecological Problems.” International Journal of Science and Society 5, no. 1 (2023): 13–27. https://doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v5i1.621.

PGI. Buku Panduan Gereja Sahabat Alam. KLH RI, STT Jakarta, 2014.

Piro, Isabella. “Vatican Document on Integral Ecology: Safeguarding Creation Is Everyone’s Responsibility.” Vatican News, 2020. https://www.vaticannews.va/en/vatican-city/news/2020-06/vatican-interdicastery-document-laudato-si-safeguarding-creation.html.

Puglisi, Antonino, and Johan Buitendag. “The Religious Vision of Nature in the Light of Laudato Si’: An Interreligious Reading between Islam and Christianity.” HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies 76, no. 1 (2020): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4102/HTS.V76I1.6063.

Villiers, DE De. “Prospects of a Christian Ethics of Responsibility (Part 1): An Assessment of an American Version.” Verbum et Ecclesia 28, no. 1 (2007): 88–109. https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v28i1.99.

Vivo, Darryl C De, Basil T Darras, Monique M Ryan, and H Royden Jones. “Introduction : Historical Perspectives.” In Neuromuscular Disorders of Infancy, Childhood and Adolescence, edited by B.T. Darras, H. Royden Jones Jr., M.M. Ryan Vivo, and D.C. De, Second edi., 3–16. Elsevier, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-417044-5.00001-9.

Watt, Stéphan Van der. “Re-Appreciating the Significance of Historical Perspectives and Practices on Reformed Pastoral Theology and Care Today.” STJ | Stellenbosch Theological Journal 4, no. 2 (2018): 753–74. https://doi.org/10.17570/stj.2018.v4n2.a34.

Woodrum, Eric, and Thomas Hoban. “Theology and Religiosity Effects on Environmentalism.” Review of Religious Research 35, no. 3 (1994): 193–206. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3511888.

Zamulinski, Brian. “Christianity and the Ethics of Belief.” Religious Studies 44, no. 3 (2008): 333–46. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27749963.

Published
2025-12-30
How to Cite
Purwanto, E. (2025). Caring for the Earth as a Matter of Faith. Te Deum (Jurnal Teologi Dan Pengembangan Pelayanan), 15(1), 27-36. https://doi.org/10.51828/td.v15i1.409