Merawat Bumi sebagai Tanggung Jawab Iman
Perspektif Kristen atas Krisis Ekologi
Abstrak
Krisis lingkungan global menuntut pendekatan baru dalam pelestarian alam, termasuk perspektif religius seperti Kekristenan. Perspektif Kristen menawarkan kerangka teologis dan etis yang penting untuk pengelolaan lingkungan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi dan menganalisis kontribusi perspektif Kristen terhadap pengelolaan lingkungan hidup melalui pendekatan tinjauan pustaka sistematis. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan tinjauan pustaka sistematis untuk mengeksplorasi konsep ekologi dalam perspektif Kristen. Data dikumpulkan dari database akademik utama seperti Scopus dan Google Scholar dengan fokus pada eko-teologi dan pengelolaan lingkungan dari sudut pandang Kristen. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa doktrin penciptaan dan pemeliharaan dalam Kekristenan mendukung tanggung jawab lingkungan. Dialog antaragama, integrasi spiritualitas Kristen dengan isu ekologis, dan pemahaman eko-teologis yang komprehensif merupakan kunci untuk mengatasi krisis lingkungan. Penelitian ini mendorong komunitas Kristen untuk terlibat aktif dalam upaya pelestarian lingkungan dan mengembangkan strategi pengelolaan yang berlandaskan pada nilai-nilai spiritual. Dialog dan kolaborasi antar komunitas religius dapat memperkuat upaya keberlanjutan global.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
Referensi
Agbiji, Obaji M. “Religion and Ecological Justice in Africa: Engaging ‘Value for Community’ as Praxis for Ecological and Socio-Economic Justice.” HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies 71, no. 2 (2015): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v71i2.2663.
Breon, John Andrew. “Christian Doctrine as a Means of Christian Spiritual Formation.” Asbury Theological Seminary, 2008. https://place.asburyseminary.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1303&context=ecommonsatsdissertations.
Bürgi, Matthias, and Urs Gimmi. “Three Objectives of Historical Ecology: The Case of Litter Collecting in Central European Forests.” Landscape Ecology 22, no. SUPPL. 1 (2007): 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9128-0.
Craig, William Lane. “Creation and Conservation Once More.” Religious Studies 34, no. 2 (1998): 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412598004326.
Damonte, Marco. “God, the Bible and the Environment: An Historical Excursus on the Relationship between Christian Religion and Ecology.” Relations 5, no. 1 (2017): 27–45. https://doi.org/10.7358/rela-2017-001-damo.
Danz, Christian. “Theology of Nature: Reflections on the Dogmatic Doctrine of Creation.” HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies 77, no. 3 (2021): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v77i3.6720.
Denyer, David, and David Tranfield. “Producing a Systematic Review.” The Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd, 2009.
Dreyer, Wim A., and Jerry Pillay. “Historical Theology: Content, Methodology and Relevance.” Verbum et Ecclesia 38, no. 4 (2017): 117–31. https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v38i4.1680.
George, Marie. “Is Eco-Theologian Thomas Berry a Thomist?” Scientia et Fides 7, no. 1 (2019): 47–71. https://doi.org/10.12775/SETF.2019.003.
Kim-Cragg, Hyeran. “Preaching Addressing Environmental Crises through the Use of Scripture: An Exploration of a Practical Theological Methodology.” Religions 13, no. 3 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13030226.
Körtner, Ulrich. “Ecological Ethics and Creation Faith.” HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies 72, no. 4 (2016): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v72i4.3296.
Körtner, Ulrich H.J. “The Human Being and the World as God’s Creation: Present-Day Ethical Conflicts and Consequences of the Doctrine of Creation in the Perspective of the Doctrine of Justification.” HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies 77, no. 3 (2021): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v77i3.6491.
Kroesbergen, Hermen. “Ecology: Its Relative Importance and Absolute Irrelevance for a Christian: A Kierkegaardian Transversal Space for the Controversy on Eco-Theology.” HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies 70, no. 1 (2014): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v70i1.2719.
Lowe, Benjamin S., Susan K. Jacobson, Glenn D. Israel, and Anna L. Peterson. “Association of Religious End Time Beliefs with Attitudes toward Climate Change and Biodiversity Loss.” Sustainability (Switzerland) 15, no. 11 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15119071.
Macklin, R. “Applying the Four Principles.” Journal of Medical Ethics 29, no. 5 (2003): 275–80. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.29.5.275.
Mitchell, Donald W. “Catholic Theology of Creation: Nature’s Value and Relation to Humankind.” Claritas: Journal of Dialogue and Culture 4, no. 2 (2015): 70–74.
Morariu, Iuliu-Marius. “Ecology – Main Concern for the Christian Space of the 21st Century? Catholic and Orthodox Perspectives.” Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 19, no. 56 (2020): 124–35.
Osgood, Libby. “Ecological Saints: Adopting a Green Gaze of the Life and Writings of Saint Marguerite Bourgeoys.” Zygon 58, no. 3 (2023): 569–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12889.
Pangihutan, Posman, and Demsy Jura. “Ecotheology and Analysis of Christian Education in Overcoming Ecological Problems.” International Journal of Science and Society 5, no. 1 (2023): 13–27. https://doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v5i1.621.
PGI. Buku Panduan Gereja Sahabat Alam. KLH RI, STT Jakarta, 2014.
Piro, Isabella. “Vatican Document on Integral Ecology: Safeguarding Creation Is Everyone’s Responsibility.” Vatican News, 2020. https://www.vaticannews.va/en/vatican-city/news/2020-06/vatican-interdicastery-document-laudato-si-safeguarding-creation.html.
Puglisi, Antonino, and Johan Buitendag. “The Religious Vision of Nature in the Light of Laudato Si’: An Interreligious Reading between Islam and Christianity.” HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies 76, no. 1 (2020): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4102/HTS.V76I1.6063.
Villiers, DE De. “Prospects of a Christian Ethics of Responsibility (Part 1): An Assessment of an American Version.” Verbum et Ecclesia 28, no. 1 (2007): 88–109. https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v28i1.99.
Vivo, Darryl C De, Basil T Darras, Monique M Ryan, and H Royden Jones. “Introduction : Historical Perspectives.” In Neuromuscular Disorders of Infancy, Childhood and Adolescence, edited by B.T. Darras, H. Royden Jones Jr., M.M. Ryan Vivo, and D.C. De, Second edi., 3–16. Elsevier, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-417044-5.00001-9.
Watt, Stéphan Van der. “Re-Appreciating the Significance of Historical Perspectives and Practices on Reformed Pastoral Theology and Care Today.” STJ | Stellenbosch Theological Journal 4, no. 2 (2018): 753–74. https://doi.org/10.17570/stj.2018.v4n2.a34.
Woodrum, Eric, and Thomas Hoban. “Theology and Religiosity Effects on Environmentalism.” Review of Religious Research 35, no. 3 (1994): 193–206. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3511888.
Zamulinski, Brian. “Christianity and the Ethics of Belief.” Religious Studies 44, no. 3 (2008): 333–46. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27749963.
##submission.copyrightStatement##
##submission.license.cc.by4.footer##Examples of Creative Commons Licensing Notifications in the Copyright Notices
1. Proposed Policy for Journals That Offer Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
2. Proposed Policy for Journals That Offer Delayed Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
