Relasi Israel dan Gereja

Sebuah Tinjauan Biblis-Teologis Berdasarkan Roma 9-11

  • Deni Telaumbanua UPH Karawaci
Keywords: Israel, Gereja, Israel dan Gereja, Roma 9-11

Abstract

Israel and church relations are generally seen in two opposite poles. At the first pole the Parentesis's view maintains the difference. At other poles the view of Covenantalis saw the unity of both. The main thesis of this article is the relationship between Israel and the church, that in the end there is only one Israelite or one church to be saved. It was evidenced through the elaboration of Romans 9-11. The Apostle Paul analogize the unity of Israel and the church with the dough and olive trees. In the end, the olive tree consists of a wild bud that is grafted (not Israel) and the original shoots (' All-Israel ' stubborn) are remade. From the description, at the end of this article, the author outlines the relationship application between Israel and the church against some other Christian doctrines, such as: Christology, Soteriology, Ecclesiology, eschatology, and in the practical life of people Christian.

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baker, David L. Satu Alkitab Dua Perjanjian. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia, 2006

Baxter, J. Sidlow. Menggali Isi Alkitab 4. Jakarta: Yayasan Komunikasi Bina Kasih/OMF, 2002.

Berkhof, Louis. Teologia Sistematika 5, terj. Yudha Thianto. Jakarta: Lembaga Reformed Injili Indonesia, 2001.

Burge, Gary M. Palestina Milik Siapa? terj. Williams B. Mailoa, dkk. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia, 2010.

Calvin, John. Commentary Upon the Acts of the Apostles, vol. second, diedit oleh Henry Beveridge. Michigan: Baker, 1989.

Cannada, Robert C. Jr. “Romans” (tidak diterbitkan), dipresentasikan pada Karawaci Presbiterian Church Conference, Tangerang, Maret, 2019.

Cox, William E. Amillenialism Today. Phillipsburg: Presbyterian and Reformed, 1966.

Cranfield, C. E. B. Romans A Shorter Commentary. Grand Rapids, Michigan: W.B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1985.

Dunn, James D. G. Word Biblical Commentary, Volume 38b: Romans 9-16. Dallas: Word Books, 1998.

Enns, Paul. The Moody Hand Book of Theology. Malang: Literatur SAAT, 2003.

Erickson, Millard J. Pandangan Kontemporer Dalam Eskatologi. Malang: SAAT, 2004.

Frame, John M. Systematic Theology. New Jersey: P & R Publishing, 2013.

Grudem, Wayne. Sytematic Theology. Leicester: Inter-Varsity Press, 1994.

Hagelberg, Dave. Tafsiran Roma. Bandung: Yayasan Kalam Hidup, 2004.

Hendriksen, William. Romans. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1981.

Hoekema, Anthony A. Alkitab dan Akhir Zaman, terj. Kalvin S. Budiman. Surabaya: Momentum, 2004.

Jaffray, R. A. Tafsiran Surat Roma. Bandung: Yayasan Kalam Hidup, 2007.

Karman, Yonky. Bunga Rampai Teologi Perjanjian Lama. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia, 2007.

Ladd, George Eldon. “Israel and the Church,” The Evangelical Quarterly, no.4 (Oct.-Dec. 1964): 206-213.

Landler, Mark. “Trump Recognizes Jerusalem as Israel’s Capital and Orders U.S. Embassy to Move,” The New York Times, 6 Desember 2017, diakses 23 Agustus 2019, https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/06/world/middleeast/trump-jerusalem-israel-capital.html

Moo, Douglas J. The Epistle to the Romans. Grand Rapids: W. B. Eerdmans, 1996.

Pentecost, J. Dwight. Things to Come. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House, 1977.

Ryrie, Charles R. Dispensasionalism Dari Zaman ke Zaman. Malang: Gandum Mas, 1995.

Saucy, Robert. Masih Relevankah Perjanjian Lama di Era Perjanjian Baru, diedit oleh John S. Feinberg. Malang: Gandum Mas, 2003).

Scheunemann, D. Inti Berita Surat Roma. Batu, Malang: YPPII, 1986.

Sutanto, Hasan. Perjanjian Baru Interlinear Yunani-Indonesia dan Konkordansi Perjanjian Baru (PIBK) Jilid II. Jakarta: Lembaga Alkitab Indonesia, 2006.

Woudstra, Marten H. Masih Relevankah Perjanjian Lama di Era Perjanjian Baru, diedit oleh John S. Feinberg. Malang: Gandum Mas, 2003.

Published
2019-12-16
How to Cite
Telaumbanua, D. (2019). Relasi Israel dan Gereja. Te Deum (Jurnal Teologi Dan Pengembangan Pelayanan), 9(1), 103-126. https://doi.org/10.51828/td.v9i1.8