Pemikiran Teologi Deuteronomis

  • Aeron Frior Sihombing STT SAPPI

Abstract

Masalah dalam tulisan ini adalah apakah yang menjadi teologi kitab Deuteonomi? Karena, ada pandangan yang menyatakan bahwa kitab Perjanjian Lama hanya berisi hukum legalis. Maka, tujuan artikel ini adalah menjelaskan ideologi, maupun teologi kitab Deuteronomi. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode historis kritis untuk mengungkapkan teologi kitab Deuteronomi. Kesimpulannya adalah bahwa teologi kitab Deteronomi adalah memerjuangkan kemanusiaan dan keadilan.

Frasa kunci: teologi, Deuteronomi, Deuteronomistik, kemanusiaan, keadilan sosial.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Christian Gertz dkk, Jan. Purwa Pustaka: Eksplorasi ke dalam Kitab-Kitab Perjanjian Lama dan Deuterononika. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia, 2017.
Clements, R. E. Old Testament Guides—Deuteronomy. Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1989.
Coote, Robert B. Sejarah Deuteronomistik: Kedaulatan Dinasti Atas Wilayah Kesukuan Israel. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia, 2015.
Driver, S. R. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary On Deuteronomy. Edinburg: T. & T. Clark, 1902.
Friedman, Richard Elliot. Review of Weinfeld, Moshe. Deuteronomy 1-11: a new translation with introduction and commentary. Publisher: New York: Doubleday, 1991.
Gottwald, Norman K. The Tribes of Yahweh: A Sociology of the Religion of Libarated Israel 1250-1050 BC. Maryknoll, New York: Orbis Books, 1999.
Mayes, A. D. H. The Century Bible Commentary: Deuteronomy. Grand Rapids: WM. B. Eerdmans Publ. Co., dan Marshal, Morgan&Scott Publ. LTD, 1981.

Noth, Martin. The Deuteronomistic History. Sheffield: JSOT Press Departement of Biblical Studies.
Otto, Eckard. Kontinuum und Proprium: Studien zur Sozial- und Rechtsgesichte den Alten Orients und des Alten Testaments. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 1996.
_______. “The Integration of the Post-Exilic Book of Deuteronomy into the Post-Priestly Pentateuch”. Dalam The Post-Priestly Pentateuch New Perspectives on its Redactional Development and Theological Profiles. (Eds) Federico Giuntoli dan Konrad Schmid. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. www.mohr.de, 2015.
Römer, Thomas Christian. “The Elusive Yahwist: A Short History of Research”. Dalam A Farewell to the Yahwist? The Composition of the Pentateuch in Recent European Interpretation. (Eds) Thomas B. Dozeman dan Konrad Schmid. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2006.
_______. “The Form-Critical Problem of the So-Called Deuteronomistic History”. Dalam Changing Face of Form Criticism for the Twenty-First Century. (Eds) Marvin A. Sweeny dan Ehud Ben Zvi (eds). Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2003.
¬¬¬¬¬_______. The So-Called Deuteronomistic History: A Socialogical, Historical and Literary Introduction. London: T&T Clarck, 2007.
Schmid, Konrad and Raymond F. Person Jr. (eds.). Deuteronomy in the Pentateuch, Hexateuch, and the Deuteronomistic History. FAT 2/56; Tübingen: Mohr Slebeck, 2012).
Von Rad, Gerhard. Studies in Deuteronomy. London: SCM Press, 1956.


_______, Gerhard. The Old Testament Library: Deuteronomy. Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, 1966.
Sénéchal, Vincent. Consensus, New Trends and Issues in Recent Research on Deuteronomy: Retribution et intercession dans le DeutEronome (BZAW 408). Berlin/New York : W. de Gruyter, 2009.
Weinfeld, Moshe. Deuteronomy and Deuteronomic School. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972.
Weinfeld, Moshe. The Anchor Bible: Deuteronomy 1-11: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. New York: The Anchor Bible Doubleday.
_______. The Anchor Bible: Deuteronomy 1-11: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. New York: The Anchor Bible Doubleday, 1971.
_______. Deuteronomy: The Present State of Inquiry. JBL 86, 1967.
Published
2019-12-20
How to Cite
Sihombing, A. F. (2019). Pemikiran Teologi Deuteronomis. Te Deum | Jurnal Teologi Dan Pengembangan Pelayanan, 9(1), 1-32. Retrieved from http://ojs.sttsappi.ac.id/index.php/tedeum/article/view/10